Right Now

Last week, voters told Congress it's time to change the culture in Washington, D.C.  Earmark reform was a significant issue in that election.  Yet a week later, the Senate is considering a bill stuffed with hundreds of earmarks costing taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars.

The American people want the "earmark favor factory" shut down, not turned over to new management.

Dr. Coburn has filed several amendments dealing with the numerous earmarks in the Agriculture Appropriations bill including:

  • The World Food Prize earmark
  • Population Management Center earmark
  • Alternative Salmon Products earmark
  • New York Goose Control earmark
  • National Wild Turkey Federation earmark
  • Lettuce Geneticist/Breeder earmark
  • Seafood Waste earmark
  • Planning and Design of West Virginia Biotech Laboratory earmark
  • Montana Sheep Institute earmark
  • Hawaii Termite earmark
  • Golf Course Loans

Many taxpayers likely were appalled by attempts to add nearly $5 billion in new spending to the military construction bill that had nothing to do with our military.  And attempts to add new emergency agriculture spending has nothing to do with helping farmers and everything to do with helping politicians.  If we were serious, we would be having an honest discussion about the failures of crop insurance, the need to open new international markets to American farm products, and the future of the family farm.

Earmarks are draining are draining resources from more important priorities.  Earmarks also siphon away funding from programs that directly assist family farmers and others to reward those who are well connected.

Earmarks in Agriculture Appropriations
(millions of dollars)
 
Fiscal year 
Total discretionary appropriation *
Total $ value of earmarks **
Earmarks as % of discretionary appropriation
Number of earmarks
2006
$17,031
$504.9
3.0%
689
2005
$16,833
$500.5
3.0%
704
2004
$16,943
$500.4
3.0%
660
2002
$16,018
$558.8
3.5%
629
2000
$13,988
$271.2
1.9%
359
1998
$13,751
$286.5
2.1%
284
1996
$13,310
$165.6
1.2%
211
1994
$14,500
$218.6
1.5%
313
Sources: CRS estimates derived from the agriculture appropriations acts of FY2006 (P.L. 109-97), FY2005 (P.L. 108-447), FY2004 (P.L. 108-199), FY2002 (P.L. 107-76), FY2000 (P.L. 106-78), FY1998 (P.L. 105-86), FY1996 (P.L. 104-37), and FY1994 (P.L. 103-111) and their accompanying conference reports and House and Senate Appropriations Committee reports. The Agricultural Research Service (ARS) budget office provided the number and dollar value of specific projects funded by Congress, whether or not requested by the Administration. Figures for the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) were provided by the NRCS budget office.
 
* Before accounting for any rescissions. ** Earmarks are defined as any designation in the agriculture appropriations act or accompanying joint explanatory statement of the conference committee, House Appropriations Committee report, or Senate Appropriations Committee report that allocates a portion of the discretionary appropriation for a specific project, location, or institution.


Date Title
11/16/06 Current record