News

Sometimes an idea is so obviously right that one can only wonder, upon learning of it, why it hadn't been thought of before.

Such is the case with a proposal by Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., to make available online a searchable database of spending by the federal government.

Want to know how much federal money is going to Halliburton? Just plug in the oil service company's name and take a look at its contracts. Curious about projects related to the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina? Wondering who is getting paid for the seemingly endless construction on that highway bridge you pass every day on the way to work?

Coburn's plan would make that information available to the citizenry. Talk about government for the people.

And searchable by the people, too.

Coburn, a freshman senator, is among the more conservative members of the Republican Party. His notion has been embraced by right-leaning groups that favor smaller government. The theory: If the people can easily see where Washington is spending money, federal lawmakers may become a bit more careful with the people's money.

But it is not only conservatives backing the database. The proposal is co-sponsored by another newcomer, Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., a favorite of the left.

And a number of liberal groups have lined up behind the plan.

Now comes the hard part.

There are those with specific agendas, activist groups and organizations of one stripe or another, who would look to see that a watered down version of the searchable database becomes law. They'll offer their changes in the name of this or of that, of national security or of greater openness that is really more secrecy. But any such effort - whether it comes from the right or from the left - must be seen for what it most likely is: an attempt to offer protection to a favored cause by shielding it from scrutiny.

That cannot be allowed. Legitimately protecting national security, of course, is imperative, but everything that can be made public must be made public.

Coburn and Obama have come up with a wise idea that will make our federal government more accountable to the people of this nation. That's something that everyone should be able to support.


Date Title
7/31/06 Editorial: Bill supports full disclosure of federal spending
7/31/06 Senator Seeks to Create a Single Spending Database
7/28/06 Spending database bill clears first hurdle
7/28/06 Senate Committee Approves Bill Exposing Federal Spending to Public
7/27/06 Editorial: Fresh Air Fund
7/25/06 Editorial: Jefferson dream close with Google-like search of spending
7/24/06 Editorial: Eye on spending
7/21/06 Editorial: Googling the feds
7/21/06 Editorial: Farm Harm
7/21/06 Web Site May Track Federal Funds
7/21/06 Congressman Proposes Allowing Public To See How Cash Is Spent
7/20/06 Proposed database would track federal spending
7/20/06 Editorial: Shedding some sunlight on federal expenditures
7/20/06 A move to lift the veil on US spending
7/16/06 Editorial: Open Up
7/13/06 Editorial: Let's all watch the flood tide roll
7/13/06 Support for stem cell research set for Senate vote
7/13/06 Homeland Appropriations: Senate Rejects Expanding Security, Anti-Terror Grants
7/13/06 Senator defeated in bid to secure more rail security funding
7/13/06 Senate to Vote on 3 Stem-Cell Study Bills
7/12/06 Editorial: Put public information on the Internet
7/12/06 Editorial: Government spending database a great idea
7/11/06 Editorial: Put The Pork Online
7/10/06 Editorial: The Holy Grail of open government
7/10/06 Editorial: Tell all on budget items
7/10/06 Editorial: Shine more light on federal spending
7/8/06 Current record
7/8/06 Maine delegation supports proposal for grant database
7/7/06 Editorial: Earmarks need some sunshine
7/7/06 Editorial: Coburn's reform plan
7/6/06 Study: U.N. Diplomats With Dim View of U.S. More Likely to Ignore Traffic Tickets
7/5/06 Coburn: Block grant program misused
7/5/06 Editorial: Coburn database idea has merit
7/5/06 On Right and Left, a Push for Government Openness
7/5/06 Editorial: Freedom of Information Act turns 40 today