News

May 24 2006

Earmarks infection

To read this article in completion, click here. An excerpt follows.

A recent poll NBC / Wall Street Journal poll found an astounding 39 percent of Americans consider appropriation earmarks, or "pork," the most important matter for Congress to address before adjournment -- more important than immigration, tax cuts, and lobbying.

It is obvious that overspending by Congress, stories of relocating a recently rebuilt railroad, erecting an indoor rain forest, providing subsidies for shiitake mushroom research, dog therapy and housing, music education at the Rock 'n' Roll Hall of Fame, and suchlike have caught the public's attention. They demand change. The president can give it to them.

One of the little secrets in Washington is that the vast majority of earmarks are not included in appropriations bills, but are described in the committee reports that accompany those bills. Since these mandates don't meet the presentment clause of the Constitution, they are not law and can be ignored. What cannot be ignored is the appropriation itself. The Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act requires the president to spend the money on the account for which it is appropriated, but not on the specific items listed in the committee reports.

In his 1987 State of the Union address, President Reagan held up a copy of the recently approved omnibus appropriations bill, cited a bevy of pork committee reports, and announced, "if you send me another one of these I will not sign it" -- and promptly received a standing ovation from the very people who had sent it to him in the first place. The next day, as the president's budget director, I endeavored to do something about report-mandated pork.

After checking with the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel as well as my own general counsel and being assured a string of court precedents had affirmed report language is not law, I instructed each executive agency head to spend money on the accounts appropriated but to spend it wisely, and in no case spend the money on projects inconsistent with the president's program (read: "ignore the pork").

Then all hell broke loose.



Date Title
5/25/06 Coburn To Investigate Congressional Violations
5/24/06 Current record
5/22/06 Railroad Earmark Cut From Supplemental
5/22/06 Supplemental Negotiators Likely To Drop Miss. Rail Project
5/22/06 Republican Clash Over Earmarks Gets Ugly
5/22/06 AIDS Vaccine Testing Goes Overseas
5/22/06 Editorial: Ship of Pork
5/19/06 Dr. Coburn Addresses global malaria control experts at United Nations
5/18/06 Editorial: It is time to give Coburn knife, help cut away the pork
5/18/06 They'd Sooner Fix Medicaid
5/18/06 ABC World News Tonight - U.S. Air Force Probe
5/17/06 Playing Politics with Government Contracts
5/17/06 Immigration bill survives changes in Senate
5/17/06 Senate rejects border security plan
5/16/06 Divide Remains as Bush Pushes Immigration Plan
5/16/06 President Bush calls for Guard deployment to gain border control
5/15/06 "New Guidelines for AIDS Testing"
5/15/06 Rep. Calvert's Land of Plenty
5/15/06 Dept. of Justice Signals Wider Probe
5/15/06 West Virginia Democrat is Scrutinized
5/15/06 Opinion: 1 small step against corporate welfare
5/14/06 In Kentucky Hills, a Homeland Security Bonanza
5/13/06 Rep. Cunningham's Plea Was Only the Start
5/12/06 Editorial: Republicans and Spending
5/12/06 House Appropriations Chairman Subject of Earmarks Investigation
5/11/06 House Appropriations Chairman Surfaces in Probe of Cunningham
5/11/06 Loopholes in earmark reform bills
5/11/06 Opinion: Don't defund troops for pork
5/11/06 Coburn seeks slash in federal spending
5/10/06 House Conservatives Encourage Leadership to Keep Pork Out of the "Emergency" Supplemental
5/9/06 In Congress, a GOP face-off over 'pork'
5/6/06 Editorial: Will Bush finally use veto power on spending?
5/6/06 Coburn sees victories in spending fight
5/4/06 Oklahoma Senator Tugs at Beloved 'Earmarks'
5/4/06 Opinion: How to Soak the Rich (the George Bush Way)
5/4/06 Coburn Brings Common Sense to Senate
5/4/06 Editorial: Prodigal State
5/3/06 Emergency vs. Pork Spending
5/3/06 Editorial: Potent Coburn
5/2/06 Editorial: Senate going hog wild
5/2/06 Bold Bid To Cut 'Pork' In Congress
5/2/06 Spending Hawks are ‘making their point, slowly but surely’
5/2/06 Northrop Seeks Navy Aid for Losses
5/1/06 Crime victims fund targeted
5/1/06 Trail of Tears: 'It wasn't just a story'
5/1/06 Opinion: Casting off appropriators' tyranny